Hickenlooper in Houston

Speaking at the IHS CERA’s annual conference in Houston on Wednesday, Colorado’s chief executive offered these comments on the issues surrounding oil and gas regulations:
State vs. Federal Regulation: “Most governors are going to argue that it should be a state responsibility …we can create regulations that are less onerous but more effective than blanket regulations that come out of Washington.”
State vs. Local Regulation: “If each county had a different set of regulations it would be very tough on our industry.”
Hydraulic Fracturing: “Transparency is a big part of the anxiety. If you look at the mechanics of horizontal drilling with fracking, it’s not hard to be able to demonstrate that we can drill for oil and gas and protect aquifers,” said Hickenlooper, a former geologist. “There have only been a couple of instances of contamination, and that’s because of shoddy well construction. Maybe we need to increase fines.”
The Governor added … that issues around fracking fluids have been “put to bed.” Now the issues are how well the wells are cemented and methane that escapes into the air.
On other forms of energy: Hickenlooper said he’d like to see tax credits for wind energy extended, though he advocates a five-year phase-out period for the subsidies.
Stay up-to-date on news and policy developments
of the Front Range’s energy boom. Start your FREE SUBSCRIPTION to NIOBRARA REPORT, from the editors of Colorado Energy News.
Filed Under: ARCHIVES • Feature Articles • Oil & Gas • Policy
Tags: colorado oil and gas industry • Colorado oil and gas regulation • Governor Hickenlooper • hydraulic fracturing



Comment by fred kirsch on 11 March 2012:
“…he advocates a five-year phase-out period for the subsidies.”
I wonder if that is his stance on oil/gas subsidies as well.
Thanks for pointing out his logical hypocrisy about who should regulate the industry.
Comment by Mike Foster on 12 March 2012:
There aren’t any oil and gas subsidies. Oil and gas drilling follows the same tax regulations as other manufacturers. When a piece of equipment is purchased the equipment is depreciated and the depreciation expense is applied toward revenues.
I don’t know how depreciation expense could be construed as a subsidy.
Can you explain your ascertation that depreciation expense is a form of subsidy?