Chu Warns of U.S. Ceding Clean Energy to China
Reported by Staff
AURORA — Energy Secretary Steven Chu warned on Friday that the United States is in danger of falling irreversibly behind other countries in the race to develop clean-energy technologies and must act quickly to avoid that fate.
The setting for the Secretary’s comments was the Colorado Energy Jobs Summit, an event organized by Sen. Mark Udall that took place at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. Chu sited several areas where he said the U.S. has fallen behind other nations, including vehicle fuel efficiency, electricity transmission efficiency, battery technology and nuclear power.
To the Secretary, China is the gorilla in the marketplace with spending on new energy technologies there reaching $100 billion a year – way ahead of the U.S.
Chu said if we fail to keep pace with other countries’ efforts in clean-energy development, the U.S. would simply be swapping one kind of dependence (foreign oil) for another (foreign technology).
“If we don’t start moving, other countries are moving, and they will look at us as a market,” he said in a news conference after the speech.
While Chu voiced concern about our country’s position in the clean energy competition, he also expressed confidence that we could return to the forefront, saying, “America has the greatest innovation machine in the world. . . . We have an opportunity before us, an incredible opportunity, to lead the world in a new industrial revolution.”
Other notable panelists at the event were Sen. Michael Bennet and Gov. Ritter. Udall said the purpose of the summit was to bring together energy and environmental experts for discussions on energy independence, economic revival and “the next bold policy step we need to take. “We need to be laying the groundwork today so that Colorado will lead the world in the clean-energy revolution,” Udall said.”
While much of the dialogue focused on America’s growing international competition in advancing new energy technologies, the topic of nuclear power was also raised. Udall said he would support a nuclear power plant in Colorado if it had local support and could be built and operated safely.
Secretary Chu stressed that the continuing climate change debate, and who is to blame for warming temperatures, has hindered efforts to embrace policies that push clean technologies. A considerable portion of his speech was spent outlining evidence in support of human-caused climate change.
“We have to convince all of America that this is a nonpartisan issue,” Chu said. “This is our economic future.”
Filed Under: ARCHIVES • Renewable Energy
Tags: Anschutz Medical Campus • clean energy technology • Gov. Ritter • Secretary Chu • Senator Mark Udall


Comment by klem on 22 February 2010:
“To the Secretary, China is the gorilla in the marketplace with spending on new energy technologies there reaching $100 billion a year – way ahead of the U.S.”
Notice how he said NEW energy technologies and not CLEAN energy technologies? Becuase China is investing billions in coal fired power plants, these are considered new energy. And Chu is right, as long as China is the low cost producer, they will look at the US as a market to sell product to. he right, this is an economic oprtunity and as long as we continue to buy product from China the same problems will remain.
Wasn’t he the guy last year who said we should all climb up and paint our roofs white to save the planet? So now he’s selling cap&Trade as an econimic solution, last year it is was to save the planet. Next year, what?
I don’t trust the guy anymore.
Comment by Jesse on 24 February 2010:
Hmm, should I trust Steven Chu, the United States Energy Secretary, who won a Nobel Price is Physics, and was previously a professor of physics and molecular and cellular biology?
Or, should I trust “Klem”, who I know nothing about and couldn’t make a coherent argument about why I shouldn’t trust Steven Chu on energy matters?
Comment by cogeo on 24 February 2010:
It might surprise a lot of Americans who will profit from carbon trading. If China only has to invest $100 billion on clean-tech to produce a $1 trillion, they would consider it a cost of doing business. Just as they perceive being cited for excessive lead levels in the children’s products they produce. The free trade we practice is not reciprocated and it is time Americans understand that we are being played in virtually every economic theater on the planet. As for Chu; one would think a physicist would be a little more astute. Next year I think an overriding concern of politician-scientists like Chu will be not just to save the planet, but save their hind quarters.