Xcel Gets Reduced Rate Increase and
Admonishment from State PUC
Updated by Staff
The Colorado Public Utilities Commission late Friday afternoon approved a $128.3 million increase in investor-owned Xcel Energy electric rates that will go into effect Jan. 1.
Colorado’s largest power supplier had originally sought a $180 million increase, which was reduced down to roughly $136 million in a settlement with two consumer groups.
The PUC estimates the increase will raise the average residential electricity bill by 6.5 percent, or about $4.43 a month. “No one likes a rate increase,” PUC Chairman Ron Binz said in a release. “But we scrubbed Xcel’s request thoroughly and believe that the reduced amount is fair.”
The increase is intended to cover the expense of several major Xcel projects, including construction of a third generating unit at the Comanche coal-fired plant in Pueblo (Comanche 3) – scheduled to come online within three weeks, 300 megawatts of new natural gas-fired generation at the Fort St. Vrain station near Platteville, investment in the SmartGridCity project in Boulder, and other power distribution upgrades.
Consumer and clean energy advocates wanted to see a sweeping rule-making change by the PUC on the issue of T&E expenses and other perks, but the commissioners, on the day before their ruling, made clear they would not go that route, instead opting to admonish Xcel on the record and make it clear they did not expect to see such expenses in future rate cases.
Clean Energy Action’s Leslie Glustrom, one of 30 interveners in the rate case, said of Tarpley’s comments, “It was a polite but powerful statement from the commissioner.”
Filed Under: ARCHIVES • Policy
Tags: Clean Energy Action • Colorado Public Utilities Commission • Xcel Energy rates


Comment by David on 14 December 2009:
This article is the outline for why us skeptics are skeptical.
Comment by Carol on 29 May 2010:
This rate increase is once again a sign of pure greed. Everyone, including ourselves being limited in our income cannot understand why the consumer is always the one to pay for these outlandish travel and fun expenses for top executives. “Only approximately $5.00″ does not seem like much to you, but what about the person whom already wears extra clothing in the winter, and forced to do without as much comfort during the remainder of the year to save money, and how are we rewarded? Higher costs.