Obama’s Energy Policy Finds Broad Support in Poll — But Cap-and-Trade Bill is Harder Sell
By Steven Mufson and Jennifer Agiesta/Original Source
Most Americans approve of the way President Obama is handling energy issues and support efforts by him and Democrats in Congress to overhaul energy policy — including the controversial cap-and-trade approach to limiting greenhouse gas emissions, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Even as public support has slipped for Obama’s health-care proposals, support for ambitious changes in energy policy has been steady. Although the issue of health care arouses more intense feelings than energy policy does, those who do feel strongly about energy and climate policy tend to tilt toward the administration’s position and a broad majority of people echo Democratic lawmakers’ views on the benefits of proposed changes.
Nearly six in 10 of those polled support the proposed changes to U.S. energy policy being developed by Congress and the administration. Fifty-five percent of Americans approve of the way Obama is handling the issue, compared with 30 percent who do not. A narrower majority, 52 to 43 percent, back a cap-and-trade system; that margin is unchanged since June. A cap-and-trade system would set a ceiling for the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions, and it would allow firms to buy and sell emissions permits.
“Something definitely has to be done,” said Marian Eldridge, a former legal secretary from East Windsor, N.J., who participated in the survey. “Anything’s worth a try at this point.” She said she tries to “ignore the politics; you get discouraged.” But she said that higher energy costs were “inevitable” and that “we’re too dependent on other countries.”
Despite public support for an energy and climate bill, the prospects for legislation remain uncertain. The House narrowly passed a measure in June, but not before inserting a multitude of provisions for consumers, interest groups and corporations. The Senate remains divided over how to move forward, and getting 60 senators to back an end to debate could be difficult. Adding to that challenge is the thin public support for the cap-and-trade approach if it were to raise consumers’ costs. Although 58 percent of those polled would support the plan if it reduced greenhouse gas emissions and cost them an extra $10 a month, support drops to 39 percent if new monthly costs reached $25.
Moreover, the Senate’s calendar is crowded with legislation on a variety of matters, including health care, appropriations, an increase in the debt ceiling and the extension of a nuclear weapons treaty with Russia.
READ THE COMPLETE ARTICLE HERE.
Filed Under: ARCHIVES • Feature Articles • POLICYWATCH
Tags: cap-and-trade • greenhouse gases • Obama Administration • Waxman-Markey Bill



Comment by Cogas on 31 August 2009:
The new energy policy skipped 50 to 100 years ahead, bypassing natural gas and our own domestic reserves of oil, which have increased by over 30% due to the efforts and enhanced technology of oil and gas companies. But it seems that since we have found it and prices have mitigated, there is more interest in using higher cost fuels (wind, solar). Education, or the lack of it, brought us to this ridiculous end game. There should be no rush to ignore our own oil and gas reserves, and those of other democratic nations, just as there is no rush to completely overhaul healthcare. These things are just too important to place in the hands of one-term governors and presidents. The results for us taxpayers and consumers is devastating. The results for folks like Obama, Ritter, Gore, Waxman, Markey, and the rest are untold book deals and speaking engagements. They won’t suffer, we will.