Regional Differences Hinder Climate Bill Consensus –
Ritter Touts Clean Energy as “Jobs Creator” to Senate Committee
Reported by Staff
WASHINGTON D.C. - Bill Ritter joined two other democratic governors on Tuesday in telling a Senate Committee “that efforts to curb global warming and spur the development of cleaner sources of energy have created jobs and new businesses in their states, a trend that could expand nationwide if Congress passes federal legislation.”
According to the governors, Colorado, New Jersey and Washington have implemented measures to achieve reductions in the gases blamed for global warming and standards requiring a certain percentage of electricity from renewable sources.
Not surprisingly, their view was not shared by the all state leaders testifying Tuesday before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, including North Dakota’s Republican governor and a Democratic state legislator from Arkansas.
“If there is a lesson…for other states and the nation as a whole, it is that good energy policy and climate policy can energize the economy and help create good-paying private sector jobs,” Ritter told the committee, although he did not volunteer that he supported the House-passed Waxman-Markey bill. The Governor used the town of Pueblo to illustrate his point, describing how it has evolved from an old steel town to a center for wind turbine production, with the arrival of European turbine manufacturer Vestas.
For her part, Gov. Chris Gregoire said Washington has nearly doubled its goal of 25,000 new “green” jobs by 2020 — and accomplished just within the last two years. The workers include architects who design energy-efficient buildings, venture capitalists investing in new technology, and farmers growing the next generation of biofuels, Gregoire said.
While not having anywhere near the level of clean energy resources of his Colorado and Washington counterparts, New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine told the committee that his state has committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent and wants to construct offshore wind farms offshore. He echoed the other governors in saying that leadership at the national level is needed to create an energy future the country is seeking.
Governor John Hoeven of North Dakota countered that the climate change legislation under consideration would cause job losses in his oil-producing state. He pointed out that it has already put a damper on new technologies for oil and natural gas extraction.
Arkansas state Democrat John Lowery brought up a common refrain from many politicians in the central part of the country — namely that while the climate change bill may create green jobs for the Northeast and West Coast, it would do harm to middle America. He essentially told lawmakers that coming down hard on oil and gas developers may be popular in Washington, but in his state, they are, along with chemical companies and farmers, integral to their communities.
The Senate panel’s top Republican, Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma commented, “As I’ve stated before, cap-and-trade benefits the coasts at the expense of the heartland.
Filed Under: ARCHIVES • Feature Articles • POLICYWATCH
Tags: biofuels • clean energy sources • Gov. Ritter • green jobs • Waxman-

Comment by cogas on 24 July 2009:
Clean energy a jobs creator? Sure it is. But first let’s mention the thousands of jobs lost when this country and governor ignored the cleaner alternative of natural gas. And the jobs that green energy creates do not compare with high paying gas jobs. So the governor can look at his green energy play as a positive, but those of us with 20/20 economic vision see that his plan is an economic death spiral for the state’s economy.
Comment by stomsky on 29 July 2009:
cogas:
Any ideas for we individuals on how to get the word out that the Cap&Trad isn’t what it’s touted to be? I mean other than contacting our Congresssional reps, which, I have seen does not help. We need to get the grassroots word out that Cap and Trad cannot be passed to the detriment to our country? Can cogas run TV ads? What can the regular folk do?
Cap&Trad will be bad for the entire country. One country alone cannot stop global warming. China and other top producing greenhouse gas countries have turned their heads the other way when it comes to reducing emissions.
Susan
Arvada
Comment by cogas on 30 July 2009:
Susan,
Cap and Trade, as proposed in the Waxman-Markey bill, will create yet another false economy in the financial sector. Yet another “industry” to fail when the people of this country educate themselves not only on the very flawed science Cap and Trade is based on, but the extremely unmeasurable effects on our climate that Cap and Trade may produce. My guess is that it is going to be a scam similar to the technology boom during the Clinton administration. Those who stand to profit from carbon trading are already seated, including Al Gore. Those who will pay for it and will be picking up the pieces when it collapses are also in place; us.
I don’t feel well represented by my local and national representatives in all of this climate change turmoil, and have voiced my opinion to them. Those who got a dose of my ire include democrats as well as a few republicans. Our politicians seem more interested in getting votes than getting it right. That leaves you and I with a dilemna; who gets our vote?. For me, I’m voting everyone out, hoping the new folks will get the hint. For you, I can’t say, but I would read the information that exists on climate change and decide for yourself. Voicing your opinion anywhere you want is your right. Congress thought that was pretty important, so they made it the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. Don’t think that your voice is not heard, because NOT engaging in intelligent discussion will only allow Waxman-Markey an easy win.