New Supply Presents Near-Term Challenges,
Opportunities for Natural Gas in Colorado
This Google Earth view shows active natural gas wells in Colorado
By Don McClure, Vice President, Government, Stakeholder Relations and Legal, EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
Colorado is blessed with many natural resources, including an abundance of natural gas reserves. The nation, in fact, has experienced a profound change in the supply of natural gas.
Recent studies, most notably one by the U.S. Department of Energy, have determined that the recoverable natural gas resources in this country are enough to last for the next 90 to 100 years based on the current rate of production. Last week,
the Potential Gas Committee, a leading authority on gas supplies,
reported that the nation’s gas reserves jumped 35 percent between 2006 and 2008. There is now a common understanding among experts that the North American natural gas industry has changed materially and permanently.
Just a few years ago, many thought natural gas supplies were peaking. Quite the opposite has occurred. Over the past two years continental natural gas production has grown nine percent due solely to new shale gas discoveries in states such as Texas, Louisiana, and Pennsylvania. Advanced, proven technologies such as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing provided the impetus to make these new “shale plays” viable.
And the new production is just beginning. As of last year, shale gas accounted for nearly 5 billon cf/d of natural gas. In ten years, this new production is expected to increase five-fold to 25 billion cf/d.
Perhaps more importantly, from a business standpoint, this new gas supply comes from wells with high rates of production in markets in close proximity to major pipeline infrastructure. As a result, these wells provide a strong return on investment.
Rocky Mountain producers face near-term challenges in terms of constrained pipeline capacity and, in general, higher cost structures, relative to some of the newer sources of natural gas production across the country. According to analysis by investment banks, the break-even costs for producers operating in areas such as the Piceance Basin of Colorado and the Powder River Basin of Wyoming are in the range of $7 MMcf to $9 MMcf versus a breakeven in Louisiana’s Haynesville of $3.25 MMcf.
How can Colorado compete and take part in this new era of abundant natural gas supply?
Let’s be clear: natural gas basins in Colorado are among the best resources in America. Technological advances helped the Rocky Mountains become a leading source of natural gas supplies and continual process advancements will lead to solutions for the near-term challenge in reducing overall cost structures. Technology also provides opportunity to tap into new resources. There are shale gas formations across Colorado and technology, given the opportunity and as the economy recovers, will unlock these opportunities.
In addition, Colorado can utilize more natural gas intra-state and help lead the nation in “moving the needle” on climate change and reducing our dependence on hostile foreign sources of oil. We can do this by increasing the utilization of natural gas for power generation and transportation.
Colorado is a net exporter of natural gas. It has historically used its natural gas exclusively for home heating and some peak power generation, leaving it with an excess of supply. By using the excess supply within the state to replace some coal generated base load electricity and as a substitute for some gasoline and diesel in transportation, we can maintain well-paying jobs and improve air quality.
Natural gas is the cleanest of all fossil fuels. It emits just over half the CO2 of coal, less than 20 percent of NOX and virtually no SOX or particulates and no mercury. This switch could occur quickly since Colorado is using only about 30 percent of the capacity of its natural gas-fired power plants.
In the case of transportation, at an estimated long-term North American price of less than $8 /MMbtu, or the equivalent of $50 per barrel WTI oil price, natural gas is about 30 percent cheaper than current North American gasoline or diesel prices. In addition, independent studies have shown natural gas tail pipe emissions are about 30 percent lower than diesel or gasoline.
Unlike power generation, however, in the case of transportation further infrastructure is needed. Currently, for example, there are seven publicly available fill stations in Metro Denver, but none between Denver and Grand Junction. Some states, such as Utah and California, are farther along the curve on this and have begun efforts to add infrastructure and encourage the use of natural gas-particularly for fleets.
North American natural gas supplies are abundant, affordable, and clean. They can play an integral role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and our dependence on hostile foreign oil sources. While regional producers will struggle in the near-term until technology provides an opportunity to reduce cost structures, the supply that is currently exported can be utilized to help meet these needs right here in Colorado.
Mr. McClure is the 2009 chairman of the Colorado Oil and Gas Association.
Filed Under: ARCHIVES • EnCanaLog • Feature Articles
Tags: Colorado natural gas • EnCana Oil and Gas (USA) Inc • Piceance Basin





Comment by cogas on 30 June 2009:
Mr. McClure makes several excellent points where Colorado natural gas is concerned. First, natural gas does have a spot in the limelight of the emissions control craze. Second, the conversion of coal-fired plants to natural gas solves not only emissions problems, but also supply and transportation problems. Natural gas reserves will continue to climb as more shale gas resources are developed, including the Niobrara and Gothic shales within Colorado. Converting to a gaseous vs traditional liquid fuel economy will, however, be the sticking point as suppliers discuss the chicken/egg options. No operator will be investing in natural gas infrastructure any time soon where it does not now exist. Several issues weigh against near-term recovery of Colorado’s natural gas industry. Obviously the global economic situation has affected demand, thus price. But politics within the state and nation have given little but confusion as to what can be expected near term. The upside shows a recovering economy and the potential for some recovering demand. But while the governor of Colorado says the natural gas industry is important to the state, the actions taken thus far seem counter to that. At the federal level there is not much mention of the inclusion of the natural gas industry in the new “green” economy, leading one to think this administration, along with the state, have decided to skip the logical next step of natural gas and pin their hopes on the renewables. No gas operator can justify renewed development of natural gas with the current prices, current and potential rules, and outlook for the near term. An optimist would begin positioning to capture the upward swing in natural gas, taking advantage of lower drilling costs, but a realist would wait. A pessimist would invest in bonds until the political climate sorts itself out.
Comment by Sid Abma on 30 June 2009:
Mr. McClure
The people of the United States have been encouraged to be a part of this reduction of global warming campaine. The only way to get the poulation involved is with electricity and light bulbs, the “low hanging fruit”.
Natural gas is not a population thing. Our State and Federal governments need to be educated. Increased natural gas energy efficiency can not only reduce greenhouse gas emissions but it can also create water. In some parts of the country this is becoming critical.
Why do power plants have such high chimney’s? Probably to try and get the waste hot exhaust and emissions as far away from the people who live around these facilities.
Why do we still allow all this energy to be wasted? Why not utilize it?
An industrial plant that could benefit from this recovered energy from the waste exhaust gases could be built next door.
Don’t want 2 industrial plants side by side?
Then have constructed a couple of hundred acres of glass greenhouses, where fruits and vegatables and flowers could be grown. The heating and cooling and irrigation water for this facility could be provided from the energy recovered from the power plants waste exhaust gases.
It would be good for employment and the local economy.
There is no reason to keep on wasteing our resources.